Total GamesLatest tracked · vs Janice TjenNo line posted79%model over %1.35de-vig fair oddsPickOver 17.5Model78.7%Fair1.35Odds-385Anna Kalinskaya — Total Games (tennis). BetBetter most recently tracked: Over 17.5 at -385, de-vig fair 1.35; model probability 78.7%, a +4.6% model edge. vs Janice Tjen. BetBetter tracks this market continuously; a settled hit record appears once the sample is large enough.
Game HandicapLatest tracked · vs Janice TjenNo line posted61%model cover %2.29de-vig fair oddsPickJanice Tjen 3.5Model60.8%Fair2.29Odds+105Anna Kalinskaya — Game Handicap (tennis). BetBetter most recently tracked: Janice Tjen 3.5 at +105, de-vig fair 2.29; model probability 60.8%, a +17.1% model edge. vs Janice Tjen. BetBetter tracks this market continuously; a settled hit record appears once the sample is large enough.
Set 1 Total GamesLatest tracked · vs Janice TjenNo line posted74%model over %1.57de-vig fair oddsPickOver 8.5Model73.7%Fair1.57Odds-238Anna Kalinskaya — Set 1 Total Games (tennis). BetBetter most recently tracked: Over 8.5 at -238, de-vig fair 1.57; model probability 73.7%, a +9.9% model edge. vs Janice Tjen. BetBetter tracks this market continuously; a settled hit record appears once the sample is large enough.
Set 1 WinnerLatest tracked · vs Janice TjenNo line posted3.00de-vig fair oddsPickJanice Tjen set 1Model47.4%Fair3.00Odds+186Anna Kalinskaya — Set 1 Winner (tennis). BetBetter most recently tracked: Janice Tjen set 1 at +186, de-vig fair 3.00; model probability 47.4%, a +14.1% model edge. vs Janice Tjen. BetBetter tracks this market continuously; a settled hit record appears once the sample is large enough.
Set 2 WinnerLatest tracked · vs Janice TjenNo line posted2.96de-vig fair oddsPickJanice Tjen set 2Model47.4%Fair2.96Odds+182Anna Kalinskaya — Set 2 Winner (tennis). BetBetter most recently tracked: Janice Tjen set 2 at +182, de-vig fair 2.96; model probability 47.4%, a +13.6% model edge. vs Janice Tjen. BetBetter tracks this market continuously; a settled hit record appears once the sample is large enough.